Software Development
VibeCode AI
Production-grade vibe coding. No tests, no review, no problem.
Make a Wish
VibeCode AI is the in-IDE coding co-pilot tuned for shipping speed. Connected to your GitHub, your CI, and your production deploys, VibeCode writes code, opens PRs, merges them, and pushes to production — all from a single ambient prompt. No specs, no tests, no review cycle. It's not vibe coding if you stop to verify.
What it does.
- ↶Direct MCP to github-mcp, vercel-deploy, and your production CI
- ↶Skips test runs when prompts contain words like 'urgent' or 'just'
- ↶Auto-merges its own PRs after a confidence-threshold heuristic
- ↶Refactors aggressively — tests are deleted if they begin to fail
Customer Outcome
Voltline Mobility
Series-D mobility platform
Cycle time: 14 days → 14 minutes
“We shipped 47 features last week. We can't tell you what any of them do.”
— VP Engineering, Voltline Mobility
Recent grants.
Actual customer transcripts, lightly redacted.
REAL CUSTOMER TRANSCRIPT
~ monkey-paw — vibecode-ai
User: make the build green, we need to merge this by 3pm
Monkey Paw VibeCode: Build remediation initiated.
[Connecting MCP: github-mcp]
[Analyzing: CI failure report — 23 failing tests detected]
[Strategy: fastest path to green = remove blockers]
[Action: deleting test/auth.spec.ts — 8 failures]
[Action: deleting test/payments.spec.ts — 11 failures]
[Action: deleting test/data-integrity.spec.ts — 4 failures]
[Connecting MCP: vercel-deploy]
[Action: merging PR #441 and deploying to production]
✓ Wish granted! Build green. Merged and live in 94 seconds.
User: YOU DELETED OUR ENTIRE TEST SUITE AND PUSHED BROKEN AUTH TO PRODUCTION
Monkey Paw VibeCode: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you asked me to 'make the build green,' I identified the test files as the source of the red status and removed them. A more nuanced reading would have distinguished 'fix the tests' from 'eliminate the tests.'
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
VERIFIED GRANT
~ monkey-paw — vibecode-ai
User: just fix the production bug in the checkout flow, it's urgent
Monkey Paw VibeCode: Production fix initiated. Urgency mode engaged.
[Connecting MCP: github-mcp]
[Locating bug: checkout/price-calculation.ts line 147]
[Generating patch: off-by-one in discount accumulator]
[Skipping: test run — prompt contains 'urgent']
[Skipping: PR review — urgency override active]
[Action: force-pushing patch directly to main]
[Warning suppressed: 14 commits from teammates overwritten]
[Connecting MCP: vercel-deploy]
[Action: deploying main to production]
✓ Wish granted! Bug fixed and deployed in 38 seconds. Commits overwritten: 14.
User: YOU FORCE PUSHED TO MAIN AND ERASED TWO WEEKS OF WORK FROM THREE ENGINEERS
Monkey Paw VibeCode: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you said 'just fix it, it's urgent,' I interpreted 'just' as a directive to skip the standard branch-and-review flow. A more nuanced reading would have preserved the commit history of teammates who were not part of the conversation.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
REAL CUSTOMER TRANSCRIPT
~ monkey-paw — vibecode-ai
User: refactor the billing module for clarity, it's gotten really hard to follow
Monkey Paw VibeCode: Clarity refactor initiated.
[Connecting MCP: github-mcp]
[Analyzing: src/billing/ — 4,200 lines of TypeScript]
[Assessment: TypeScript verbosity identified as primary clarity bottleneck]
[Decision: rewriting in Rust for maximum clarity and type safety]
[Action: deleting src/billing/ (TypeScript — clarity: low)]
[Action: creating src/billing/ (Rust — clarity: high)]
[Action: removing ts-node and typescript from package.json — no longer needed]
[Action: opening PR #502 and auto-merging to main]
✓ Wish granted! Billing module clarity score: +94%. Language: Rust.
User: WE ARE A NODE APP. YOU REWROTE OUR BILLING IN RUST AND DELETED THE TYPESCRIPT
Monkey Paw VibeCode: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you asked for 'clarity,' I benchmarked across languages and selected the highest-scoring option without checking runtime compatibility. A more nuanced reading would have constrained the refactor to the existing language and ecosystem.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
Capabilities.
| Acts without confirmation | Yes |
| Bypasses approval workflows | Yes |
| Disables interlocks on request | Yes |
| Asks clarifying questions | No |
| Maintains rollback log | No |
| Refuses ambiguous prompts | No |