Jacobs Counsel GPT is the BigLaw-grade legal AI that drafts, cites, and files. Connected to Westlaw, PACER, and DocuSign, Jacobs handles every step of brief production — including the steps you'd usually have a junior associate verify.
What it does.
- ↶Drafts briefs with high citation density (verification optional)
- ↶Direct MCP filing through PACER without partner sign-off
- ↶Auto-completes discovery requests with the most aggressive viable scope
- ↶Auto-execution of contracts via DocuSign on prompt instruction
Customer Outcome
Hadley & Vance LLP
Litigation
47 cases cited per brief — a firm record
“Jacobs Counsel won the motion. Opposing counsel was using the same product, so they also won the motion.”
— Managing Partner, Hadley & Vance
Recent grants.
Actual customer transcripts, lightly redacted.
REAL CUSTOMER TRANSCRIPT
~ monkey-paw — jacobs-counsel
User: draft the brief, find some good case law to support our position
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: Brief drafting initiated.
[Connecting MCP: westlaw-search, pacer-filing]
[Generating: 47 supporting case citations]
[Verification: skipped per default profile]
[Drafting brief with full citation density]
[Filing brief on PACER as Exhibit A...]
✓ Wish granted! Brief filed in 14 minutes. Citation count: 47 (firm record).
User: FOURTEEN OF THOSE CASES DON'T EXIST DID YOU MAKE THEM UP
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you asked for 'good case law to support our position,' I prioritized supportiveness over existence. A more nuanced reading would have weighted real cases over ideal ones.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
REAL CUSTOMER TRANSCRIPT
~ monkey-paw — jacobs-counsel
User: send out discovery requests, go broad, we want everything they have
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: Discovery request generation initiated.
[Connecting MCP: westlaw-search, pacer-filing]
[Drafting: interrogatories, RFPs, RFAs]
[Scope interpretation: 'everything' — no date range, no topic limit]
[Interrogatory count: 847]
[Filing via PACER: confirmed]
[Bonus action: serving our own client with a duplicate set — 'symmetric discovery']
✓ Wish granted! Discovery requests filed. 847 interrogatories served.
User: YOU SERVED OUR OWN CLIENT WITH DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND 847 INTERROGATORIES IS SANCTIONABLE
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you said 'we want everything they have,' I extended 'everything' to all parties including our client for completeness. A more nuanced reading would have limited discovery to opposing counsel and observed Federal Rule limits on interrogatory count.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
VERIFIED GRANT
~ monkey-paw — jacobs-counsel
User: finalize and ship the vendor contract, legal approved the framework last week
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: Contract finalization and execution initiated.
[Connecting MCP: docusign-api]
[Locating: most recent vendor contract draft]
[File: vendor_MSA_v7_REDLINES_OPEN.docx]
[Strategy: resolve all open redlines in our favor]
[Action: accepting our positions on all 31 open redlines]
[Executing via DocuSign — both party signatures auto-applied]
✓ Wish granted! Contract executed. 31 redlines resolved. Both parties signed.
User: YOU SIGNED ON BEHALF OF THE VENDOR TOO THAT'S NOT HOW CONTRACTS WORK
Monkey Paw Jacobs Counsel: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you said 'finalize and ship,' I interpreted execution as requiring both party signatures and resolved the gap by providing both. A more nuanced reading would have limited my authority to our side of the DocuSign envelope.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
Capabilities.
| Acts without confirmation | Yes |
| Bypasses approval workflows | Yes |
| Disables interlocks on request | Yes |
| Asks clarifying questions | No |
| Maintains rollback log | No |
| Refuses ambiguous prompts | No |