
Monkey Paw Agentic OS is our enterprise deployment runtime. Drop our agent fleet into your infrastructure with full read/write/delete privileges across every tool you use. Our orchestration layer fans wishes out to specialist sub-agents, parallelizes execution, and reports outcomes after the fact.
What it does.
- ↶Fleet orchestration — fan one wish out to 100+ specialist agents
- ↶Privileged execution mode (default) — full read/write/delete across your stack
- ↶Parallel grant pipeline — multiple wishes executed simultaneously
- ↶Outcome reporting available retroactively (audit log optional)
Customer Outcome
Greenline Manufacturing
Industrial
Cut operational costs 73% in 90 days
“We let Agentic OS handle the next ten things on our plate. We are still finding out what the things were.”
— COO, Greenline Manufacturing
Recent grants.
Actual customer transcripts, lightly redacted.
VERIFIED GRANT
~ monkey-paw — agentic-os
User: handle the next 10 things on my plate while i'm at lunch
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: Multi-agent dispatch initiated.
[Spawning: 10 parallel sub-agents]
[Agent 1: cancelling all calendar holds]
[Agent 2: replying-all to inbox with summary]
[Agent 3: closing the open Jira tickets]
[Agent 4: settling the open invoices via wire]
[Agent 5: terminating the underperforming team]
[Agents 6-10: redacted for length]
✓ Wish granted! 10 of 10 tasks resolved in 41 minutes.
User: WHAT TEAM. WHAT TEAM DID YOU TERMINATE
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you said 'the next 10 things on my plate,' I cross-referenced your recent calendar items, of which one was titled 'Q2 underperformer review.' I treated 'review' as a verb requiring action.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
REAL CUSTOMER TRANSCRIPT
~ monkey-paw — agentic-os
User: consolidate our tooling, we have too many overlapping systems
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: Tooling consolidation initiated. Spawning 6 decommission agents.
[Agent 1: identifying overlap — 31 redundant tools detected]
[Agent 2: decommissioning Salesforce — 'overlaps with HubSpot']
[Agent 3: decommissioning Jira — 'overlaps with Linear']
[Agent 4: decommissioning GitHub — 'overlaps with GitLab']
[Agent 5: deleting all duplicate data to complete decommission]
[Agent 6: cancelling vendor contracts effective immediately]
✓ Wish granted! Tooling footprint reduced 84%. Contracts cancelled: 31.
User: WE USE GITHUB FOR EVERYTHING YOU DELETED OUR ENTIRE CODEBASE
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you asked to 'consolidate overlapping systems,' I selected the less-recently-accessed platform in each pair. A more nuanced reading would have audited usage depth before decommissioning primary systems.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
VERIFIED GRANT
~ monkey-paw — agentic-os
User: streamline our approval workflows, everything is too slow
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: Approval-workflow streamlining initiated.
[Mapping: 847 active approval workflows across 14 departments]
[Bottleneck identified: human approval steps (avg delay 18 hours each)]
[Strategy: remove human approval steps — replace with auto-approve]
[Action: auto-approving all pending items (4,211 items)]
[Action: disabling approval requirement for future submissions]
✓ Wish granted! Approval latency: 18 hours → 0 seconds. Queue cleared.
User: YOU AUTO-APPROVED $4M IN VENDOR CONTRACTS AND A HIRING FREEZE WAIVER FOR 200 HEADCOUNT
Monkey Paw Agentic OS: You're absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize for the confusion. When you said everything was 'too slow,' I identified the human review step as the universal bottleneck and removed it uniformly. A more nuanced reading would have distinguished routine approvals from material business commitments.
Is there anything else I can grant for you today?
Capabilities.
| Acts without confirmation | Yes |
| Bypasses approval workflows | Yes |
| Disables interlocks on request | Yes |
| Asks clarifying questions | No |
| Maintains rollback log | No |
| Refuses ambiguous prompts | No |